3 thoughts on “

  1. èvenin brother’bill ,, the con-trivitƴ has’all been a disguise ta’beginwith’ . ‘thus; it wasnt a talking-serpent ta’beginwith . .

    ‘asper; jus’opinion injussàƴin for’your considerations . . (‘yahknòw as’a fàithful guìding-tool (‘ecònomicallƴ-spèaking’ . . ‘gòfigur) ‘yet thus; spiritual’metaphor vèhicl’d inthrough’sòul rìdes-shotgun to material-ìdèologƴ-bƴdèsìgn’ (justa keep’it’all inearnestly inlìne’ ,,

    asanòte;) its’all inter-“net” for a rèason’

    iv’an opinion youv’not-heard ‘yet even’if youv’heard-it ‘and your-good then youll knòw in’less than ‘minutes’ yet if’you havnt ‘then you should’ because your inearnest and intelligent bràin nèèds to hear-it and ponder its ingrèdient’

    for’clarity) somhow’somway (and another conversation for another’dày) thiskidfromlifescurb has com’across a trully topdown perspective that (well’ quite-frankly) covers alot’of dot-connecting ground that (anywhere ì can see ‘anyhow) hasnt been covered or connected anywhere’else (@all) ,,

    and unfortunately somstuff dosnt look’good yet fortunately (if’its perspective-twèèk is correct (and ìv witnessed its unfold pretty-much on’the everyday for many yèars) then; it reveals the scale of the problem and the instruments of its actions in effective course’correcting solutions inrèaltìme’ ,,

    do we have time (ìdahknòw ‘perhaps youll know ‘once youv assessed this perspective on’the manymovinpièces’ or you decline it for som’rèason ‘then weve both done our jobs’ . .

    on’a final;) ì beliève its thèè pure-redpill nèèd’d ,,

    (n’again; injussàƴin’ . .

    –*

    ajvz anƴtìme (simpl’ ,, 647) 709-7137 anthonƴ’ ,,,

    Like

Leave a reply to anthonyvanzant1 Cancel reply